Search for: All records

Abstract Abiotic and biotic factors interact to influence phenotypic evolution; however, identifying the causal agents of selection that drive the evolution and expression of traits remains challenging. In a field common garden, we manipulated water availability and herbivore abundance across 3 years, and evaluated clinal variation in functional traits and phenology, phenotypic plasticity, local adaptation, and selection using diverse accessions of the perennial forb, Boechera stricta. Consistent with expectations, drought stress exacerbated damage from herbivores. We found significant plasticity and genetic clines in foliar and phenological traits. Water availability and herbivory interacted to exert selection, even on traits like flowering duration, which showed no clinal variation. Furthermore, the direction of selection on specific leaf area in response to water availability mirrored the genetic cline and plasticity, suggesting that variation in water levels across the landscape influences the evolution of this trait. Finally, both herbivory and water availability likely contribute to local adaptation. This work emphasizes the additive and synergistic roles of abiotic and biotic factors in shaping phenotypic variation across environmental gradients. 

Abstract Thermal environments vary widely across species ranges, establishing the potential for local adaptation of thermal performance optima and tolerance. In the absence of local adaptation, selection should favor mechanisms to meet thermal optima. Floral temperature is a major determinant of reproductive success in angiosperms, yet whether gametic thermal performance shows signatures of local adaptation across temperature gradients, and how variation in gametic thermal performance influences floral evolution, is unknown. We characterized flowering season temperatures for the forb, Argentina anserina, at extremes of a 1000 m elevation gradient and generated thermal performance curves for pollen and ovule performance in populations at each extreme. Thermal optima fell between mean and maximum intrafloral temperatures. However, cooler high-elevation populations had ~4 °C greater pollen thermal optima than warmer low-elevation populations, while tolerance breadths did not differ. We then tested whether plants at elevational extremes differentially warmed the floral microenvironment. High-elevation flowers warmed significantly more than low, bringing intrafloral temperatures nearer the pollen optima. A manipulative experiment demonstrated that stronger warming in high elevation was conferred by floral tissues. Elevational divergence in floral warming may be driven, in part, by selection on flowers to meet different thermal demands of the gametophytes.